| Do you agree that the NFL should have banned the playing of Gary Glitter's song Rock and Roll Part 2? |
|
Do you agree with the NFL for its ban on Gary Glitter. His "Rock and Roll (Part 2)," is played to excess at many stadiums, but the NFL has asked teams to stop playing the song in the aftermath of Glitter's conviction for child sexual abuse. |
|
Don't see how it will change anything. Regardless of what the artist has done I think 'Rock and Roll Part 2' is an excellent Stadium Anthem. |
|
GOD YES! that tired old thing should have been put away years ago, let's try to do a little better than that I don't think they should. If you go do background checks on all singers and their past we might not have a lot of music to listen to. Yes because everytime they play it they have to pay him royalties. The guy is a scum bag i think they should stop playing it because its overplayed and irritating. as far as banning it because he was a child molester...... well, i dont think that too many ppl even know who he is, so i dont think anyone would get the point. he's a one hit wonder from 20 years ago. if i saw him on the street right now i wouldnt know him from any other jackass. Look at it this way... Ray Lewis didnt murder anyone, he was there when it happened, but he didnt actually put a knife into anyone, his entourage did. The guys they killed were the instigators so it was self defense by his enoturage, get your facts straight girl beforee youy come on here talking about Ray Lewis and "Murder". Yes there is 20 players on each team with criminal pasts, but i bet none of them are sexually molesting and having sex with young little children......big difference between a DUI , or weed possession and Sexually molesting little innocent children i don't really care about the artists past as pertaining to the playing of a song...just that the song is played out and boring no because it's a classic sports anthem |
| Topic Related |
|
|
