| Should the Superbowl be played only in domed stadiums? |
|
Yesterday's Super Bowl was the only Super Bowl that was rainy. |
|
yep.yesterday's superbowl sucked |
|
No way. that was an awesome game. I don't think so. I think that the rain added more excitement to the Superbowl. Also I think it added excitement to the half-time show. Prince's song Puple Rain fit right in. No....dude....this is football 1 of the most demanding sports ever, a weather don't really hurt. If it gets 2 bad....officials will stop. No I think the rain really added something to the game. It changed the outcome of the game. There were a lot of fumbles, missed field goal etc. I also think the rich/priveledged people who get tickets to the superbowl had to sit in the rain and that is fun to know too. No, we don't play regular season games in all domed stadiums, why change the game? So it rained, they have played in rain and snow during the season. Why play with the format that has been in existence for many years. Remember when championship games were played in Green Bay and Chicago.. i know in seattle we will never get a super bowl because of our weather but it was a nice day here.i think every city should get a chance on getting a superbowl.its football there should be weather involved. No... it didn't affect the outcome. That was Bears weather, and the Colts still dominated. I don't think it matters. It' all about the weather baby,all about the weather! I was thinking the very same thing,so my answer is yes. No, it should be played like any other NFL game. If anything, they should start holding them in open stadiums the Northeast. Who wouldnt love to see a SuperBowl in Green Bay, Buffalo, Cleveland, or Pittsburgh when its -10 degrees? The NFL is an elitist sport who only caters to the rich. Its only sport where the championship is held at a neutral stadium 1500 miles away from their fans who supported them all year. Personally, I'm glad they all got drenched. Absolutely! I think the same conditions that apply to playoffs and regular season should apply to the Superbowl. No way. As far as I am concerned none of the stadiums should be domed. Football is made to be played outside. I think they just started building domes to get more fans to go to games. HELL NO this is football not baseball. There is no tarp or rain delays in football. One of the best games i saw was a Sunday night game between Jets and Dolphins it was like we used to play back in the day. In pouring rain! It was entertaining. What's better than turnover after turnover....its like a see saw. No, the Superbowl should be played, out in the elements, preferably where the teams are from. If they are from different climates, there should be a common ground for them to play on. Nah. Dumb idea. Domed stadiums are only any use to the fans, but football (like baseball) is ALWAYS best played out doors. Yes, it did stink yesterday in the rain! A domed or a stadium with a retractable roof. In a championship game I just want to see the two best teams play. This years Superbowl came down to luck, who recovered the turnovers. hell no! What's the big deal with a little weather. No. If it were up to me there would be no domed stadiums. The weather is what it is, and teams should make adjustments when necessary. Hell no. The rain was great! We're playing football here, no need to play inside. It's only cold that could confer an unfair advantage... |
| Topic Related |
|
|
