Both will be very good players and both are top NFL prospects but right now Brohm is better. If he plays this year like he did last with his measurables he might be the top pick in next years draft (and I am a big U of M fan, just being realistic). Henne again has the tools to dominate this season and will be among the first QBs to go, just is a notch below Brohm at this point (but things can and often do change). Brohm will have to carry his team (plenty capable...proved that last season) and Henne has a nice luxury in Hart lugging the ball for him (which will cost Henne some Heisman votes...Brohm has to be considered the frontrunner right now).

Brian Brohm, because with an injured running back some people thought could have won the heisman (Michael Bush), he had to carry the load.

Henne had one of the best receivers in Mario Manningham, and a superb defense, so my vote goes to Brohm.

To the guy above, Brian Brohm wasn't even the best QB on his team. Hunter Cantwell who played 6 games while Brohm was injured, had a better rating, completion percentage, and yards per attempt. Kolby Smith who had 5.6 yards per rush, filled in nicely after Bush went down so he had a good back working for him as well as Harry Douglas (1265 yards) and Mario Urrutia (973 yards) as recievers. I think they are pretty good recievers.

Henne did have Hart who is one of the better backs but Manningham was injured for 4 games and only had 704 yards. Brohm is in a system which produces outstanding stats for any QB running it. Henne is in a system which is more pro style and overall I think Henne will be a better NFL quarterback. Henne has been a starter since he was a freshman and has more wins than any QB going into the 2007 season. He has started every game and is tough both physically and mentally. If I was a coach, I would start Henne over Brohm every time.

Brian Brohm

its definitely Brohm, and im a HUGE U of M fan..........

Henne has a tendecy to lose his mind and make terrible decisions, far too often, and at the worst times