Since 2002 the two conferences have played 8 times. the PAC 10 has won 6 of those games...your thoughts on this?????

2002:
OR vs MS ST...OR won
USC vs AUB...USC won
2003:
USC vs AUB...USC won
OR vs MS ST...OR won
2005:
USC vs AK...USC won
2006:
CAL vs TN...TN won
USC vs AK...USC won
AZ vs LSU...LSU won

In all of those matchups, the better team won, that's just that. Overall, the Pathetic 10 is no match for the SEC, the PAC 10 is a 2 team (you could argue 1 team) conference. SEC has multiple top 10 teams consistently every year. Noone can touch that. USC is a good team, Miss. St. is the SEC's worst team so big deal we could do this all day. USC was great with Leinart, White, Bush, but it's over.

The Pac-10 is the conference of champions, with more national titles then any other conference by far.

I'm a Pac 10 fan, but I believe the SEC from top to bottom is the best conference in the country. It HAS to be, since football is practically a religion in the Deep South!

SEC or PAC-10, both are cool. I went to a SEC school and now I'm in a PAC-10 school. So, I'm cheering for both of them. I'm a Bruin, and we lost against Florida State, I HOPING that my Volunteers smash the hell out of Penn State in the Outback Bowl to compesate the Bruins loss. Go Vols!! ~ Go Bruins!! Actually, PAC-10 in general is a better conference in terms of all the sports. PAC-10 has won more championships when it comes to all sports together; but if we are talking about only football, the SEC is a little bit tougher than the PAC-10. California was ranked #6 or #7 at the beginning of the season and they got smashed by the coolest school of the South, the TENNESSEE VOLUNTEERS!!!