• Home
  • League
  • Team
  • Equipment
  • Knowledge
  • Related
  • Store
Home Page >> Football Team >> Usc Football
USC 'best team in the history of college football." Who agrees with me?

鈥淭here is no question in my mind that USC is the best team in the country and may be the best team in the history of college football,鈥?Harbaugh said Thursday at the Pac-10 football coaches鈥?annual media day.

Former Washington State, Miami, Oregon State and NFL coach Dennis Erickson, back in the Pac-10 with Arizona State, said the Trojans should be in the NFL.

鈥淭hey鈥檙e as good as there is in the country,鈥?he said.

No, they suck!

Well i like Michigan but Notre Dame's won more Nation Championships(13)

um NO,,, we dont agree with you
at the very least i dont

They are not college because they pay their players to go there. They are dis-qualified!

I wouldn't claim that a team that lost to UCLA and Oregon State last year might be expected to be the best in history. Wait and see, it's why they play the game...

Harbaugh played for Bo Schembechler. Bo used to make every opponent out to be the best team in the country. Jim learned well. Behind closed doors I guarantee that hes telling his team the only game that matters is that USC game. Thats the one where they can do something to make people have to notice them. Its a 40 year old coaches trick.

GO PLAY IN THE SEC USC!!!

YEAH YALL WILL NEVER MAKE IT OUT ALIVE IN THERE!!

AND EVERYONE KNOWS THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP IN 2003 BELONGS 100%TO LSU!!!!!

GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!

I would love to see them in the NFL and go 0-16 year after year. What a dumb statement.
Also, USC is by far the best college football team that money can buy and who says that cheaters don't prosper especially when you know how to beat the system.
I know it won't happen but I sure would like to see Carroll and Bush write a book on how to screw the NCAA investigators.

As an Arizona Wildcats fan/alumnus I want to say no they're just bunch of beach boy punks. However, they are good and have been for five or six years in a row.
Pete Carroll has brought them back.

I would cut my tongue off if I ever uttered USC is the best team. Thats just ignorant of college football. They only became great in the late 70s to present. Talk about teams that have been dominant since the 30s even the 20s.

They are as good as it gets. But my money for absolute best would be that Nebraska team that beat Florida or the Univ. of Washington team in 92' or 93' that won the national championship. Those are the 2 best I've seen.

and judging by the recruitment of joe mcknight, they already play by NFL rules.

think happy thoughts till january when TEXAS once again ruins your hyped up dreams. {{not to mention espn, the east coast media's bias against all TEXAS teams, and pathetic Les "i might win a title with sabans players" Miles}}

NOTRE DAME!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dude, the only reason USC keeps winning the PAC10 is because it's a shitty as hell conference. They're the only decent team in there. If they played in a real conference like the SEC, BIG 10, Big 12, ect. they would not be #1 every year. USC is a decent team in a horrible conference. That certainly doesn't make them #1 in the history of college football. If they played in the SEC and won every year, then maybe you would have an argument. However, as it stands, I cannot tolerate USC. I HATE that team because they are sooooo OVERRATED. That's like Ohio State or Michigan playing an entire conference full of Indianas and Illinois and then claiming we were the best. Give me a break.

I don't agree. I've got just two words for you: GO BLUE!

I agree USC Trrojans rule

i cant agree....i am a buckeye and it feels morally wrong to say that USC is best team in the history of college fb.....and puhleeeese! the season hasnt even started......geesh!

NOOOOOO IT'S ALL ABOUT THE U

GO CANES.

I agree that USC is a very good team, but this team has not won a game yet. I do not agree with the best team ever, as it is unfair to say that since there is no way they can go head to head. It can only be done via stats and emotions. Having said this I believe the 1972 USC along with the 1974 Ohio State teams may have been the two best ever. Not far behind is the 1970 Nebraska and 1993 Alabama teams.

Well now isn't that special why don't we just not play this season as JUST hand over the BCS trophy to Men of Troy? Come on what are you smoking sounds like it some pretty good tree, Due lets let the season play out and wait till the BSC championship game and then you can crow all you want. I think that UCLA may have something to say about crowning them Kings without playing a game ya think!

I don't agree. They have been fantastic in recent years, but Notre Dame & Michigan still top the all time rankings.

For one, The season, much less game 1 of it, has yet to be played, so don't go annointing "best team in history" stuff to anyone. Second, when USC can get through a season undefeated and beat 4 top ten teams('95 NU, including a 63-24 nat'l champ game against #2 Florida), or the #2, 3 and 4 teams in the country ('71 NU), maybe then they can lay some claim to the "best team in history." Until then, yes, they are impressive, I don't know many who would want to play them this year, but we'll see how they do. They didn't do so well when this mantra was placed on them two years before their loss to Texas.

Topic Related
  • Usc's schemes????
  • Is USF the inverse of USC?
  • USC in the SEC?
  • USC didn't cover last night?
  • USC and LSU??????????
  • USC 'best team in the history of college football." Who agrees with me?
  • USC game on Sauturday?
  • USC v LSU Matchup will never happen! Who agrees with me?
  • Usc bedding?
  • Who watched the USC vs. Ucla?
  • About Us|Conditions of Use|Privacy Notice|Add Favorite|Contact Webmaster

    ©2000-2007 nokiasugarbowl.com All rights reserved.